Legal Opinion

Lewis v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1936No. 24814PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This case involves the asserted liability of a municipality to a person who claims to have been injured while traveling along a sidewalk by reason of an alleged defect in the walk. It differs from many cases with which we are confronted in that the defective condition of the walk is alleged to have been created as the result of the adoption by the municipality of an improper plan of construction as distinguished from the failure on the part of the municipality to repair or properly maintain the walk after the construction thereof. This distinction, as we shall subsequently point out, requires…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Morris v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WheetleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Oklahoma City v. CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. City of Holdenville v. TalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. City of Ada v. CriswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API