Legal Opinion
Frank v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 31, 1986No. 60014PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*579OPALA, Justice.
The issues presented are: [1] whether the terms of the medical payment coverage of the automobile insurance policy are ambiguous insofar as they afford benefits on each of two vehicles when only one was in the accident giving rise to the claim; and, if they are not found to be ambiguous, [2] whether — as a matter of public policy — the insured is entitled to aggregate the limits of medical payment benefits afforded for each vehicle.
According to the stipulated facts, Gary B. Frank [insured] and his deceased wife, Linda Frank, owned two automobiles and were the named insureds of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- London v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Simpson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Starrett v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.