Legal Opinion

Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1996No. 85860PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Vice Chief Judge.

Two issues are presented by the questions certified: 1 1) whether the doctrine of reasonable expectations applies to the construction of insurance contracts in Oklahoma; and 2) what circumstances give rise to the doctrine’s operation. Under the reasonable expectations doctrine, the objectively reasonable expectations of applicants, insureds and intended beneficiaries concerning the terms of insurance contracts are honored even though painstaking study of the policy provisions might have negated those expecta tions. 2 We find that the reasonable expectations doctrine…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Edens v. Netherlands InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API