Woods v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
Condition 4 of both the Spencer and Woods policies provides that the medical provisions of Part III “apply separately” to each automobile insured therein. Relying upon this provision plaintiff contends that as to each policy she is entitled to treat the applicable limit on medical payments liability as applying to each car for which separate premiums have been paid, and to compute the amount recoverable by multiplying the respective liability limitation by the number of “owned automobiles.” Thus, she argues, she is entitled to payments of $1,000 for each of the three cars…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Central Surety & Insurance Corporation v. ElderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Kansas City Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Gaston County Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Northfield InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.