Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1999No. 89,093PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Justice.

¶ 1 The facts of this matter are undisputed and its resolution turns on the law. Plaintiff Floyd Simpson had four automobile liability policies of insurance with defendant Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. Each poli*1264cy covered a car owned by Simpson. All of the policies provided medical expense coverage in identical language, although three of the policies had liability limits of $5,000.00 each, while the fourth contained a $2,000.00 limit of liability. Simpson was involved in an accident and sustained medical expenses in an amount exceeding $17,000.00, which was the aggregate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Conner v. Transamerica Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Richardson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Frank v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Haworth v. JantzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API