O'Reilly v. General Dynamics Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) reversing the commissioner’s award of compensation to the plaintiff. The plaintiff argues that the board improperly (1) determined that she had not sustained her burden of proving a causal relationship and (2) substituted its own findings of fact for those of the trial commissioner. We reverse the board’s decision.
The plaintiffs claims are interrelated and the following facts are necessary to our resolution of this appeal. The plaintiffs husband, Michael O’Reilly, was employed as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Aurora v. Miami Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dengler v. Special Attention Health Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Testone v. C. R. Gibson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Card v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Dixon v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.