Legal Opinion

Aurora v. Miami Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 14, 1986No. 3822PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is taken from a decision of the compensation review division of the workers’ compensation commission pursuant to General Statutes § 31-30lb. The review division affirmed a decision of the compensation commissioner who had ordered the *46custodian of the Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund (Fund) to assume liability for compensation payments to be made to the claimant, Peter Aurora, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-349. The Fund claims error in the review division’s conclusions (1) that the employer’s insurer sustained its burden of proving that Aurora’s injury had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. DeWitt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. Luddie v. Foremost Insurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Chiaia v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Erisoty v. Merrow Machine Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API