Legal Opinion
Struckman v. Burns
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1987No. 13136PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether medical reports and bills may be admitted into evidence under General Statutes § 52-174 (b) without testimony from the medical practitioner who prepared them where the medical practitioner resides outside of this state, and, therefore, cannot be subpoenaed for a trial in Connecticut.1 We conclude that such reports and bills are admissible under the statute and find no error in the trial court’s ruling to that effect.
A jury verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff in this action under General Statutes § 13a-144, the defective highway statute,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.