Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1943No. 6503PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
Can a city, as a part of a general zoning plan, create small general utility zones throughout residential districts, for the purpose of placing within convenient distance of the inhabitants of the residential district certain small businesses, handling daily conveniences and necessities for the home?
That is the real question involved in this appeal. The questions presented on the record, and argued as grounds for reversal of the judgment, are more specific, and may be stated thus:
1. Was the court in error in hearing the matter under plaintiff’s pleadings?
2. Is the city’s…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.