Legal Opinion

Higbee v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1940PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement, the trial court entered judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint that prayed judgment enjoining the defendant railroad company from abandoning service at a central passenger depot and erecting another passenger depot to1 supply such service near but within the city limits. The ground laid in the complaint for the injunction is in the main that the erection of the proposed depot would violate a zoning ordinance existing at the time an amending ordinance was enacted purporting to authorize the proposed change, which amending ordinance is claimed to1 be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rowland v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Geisenfeld v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API