Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1969No. 17PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

Acme desires to purchase from CP&L the electric power it requires for the operation of its manufacturing plant. CP&L desires to sell that power to Acme. They have entered into a contract for such purchase and sale. We are not required to determine whether Acme could compel an unwilling CP&L to serve it.

Lumbee is a customer of CP&L. We are not, however, presently required to determine whether, as such customer, it may bring a proceeding before the Utilities Commission to prevent CP&L from constructing an extension of CP&L’s facilities on the theory that such extension will be unprofitable and,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Davis v. NC Granite CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API