State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
Acme desires to purchase from CP&L the electric power it requires for the operation of its manufacturing plant. CP&L desires to sell that power to Acme. They have entered into a contract for such purchase and sale. We are not required to determine whether Acme could compel an unwilling CP&L to serve it.
Lumbee is a customer of CP&L. We are not, however, presently required to determine whether, as such customer, it may bring a proceeding before the Utilities Commission to prevent CP&L from constructing an extension of CP&L’s facilities on the theory that such extension will be unprofitable and,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Davis v. NC Granite CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.