Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Wosika

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1919No. 8676PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from. District Court, Canadian County ; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Ed. Wosika and another against Chas. McCoy and another. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, motion for new trial denied, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Canadian county.

Ed. Wosika and Will Wosika, plaintiffs below, filed their action on the 28th day of September, 1914, against Chas. McCoy and S. B. Dunafon, as defendants, to recover the sum of $700 damages for conversion of 18 acres of com. and a quantity of hay grown upon the N. W. %. of section 29', township 13, range 10 W., I. M., during the season of 1914. The parties will be designated plaintiffs and defendants, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs alleged that, while they were in possession of the same und.er and by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blasdel v. GowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Bunker v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Shawnee Nat. Bank v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Farmers Nat. Bank v. HartoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Carignano v. BoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. LattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Barnes v. McKinneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API