Legal Opinion

Knupp v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1928No. 17298PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEACH, C.

C. H. Hubbard, as plaintiff, sued W. J. Knupp, as defendant, in the district court of Osage county, and alleged in his petition, in substance, that the parties entered into a verbal contract, defendant acting by and through his agent and employee, one McKinley, wherein it was agreed that plaintiff should drill an oil well for the defendant for a consideration of $2.50 per foot to the Mississippi lime, and $6 per foot thereafter; $50 per day of 12 hours for cleaning out, reaming, mud-ding', plugging-, and waiting- on material, fuel and water; the defendant to furnish rig, fuel and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Lane v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Anthes v. AnthesIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fiedler v. McKea Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. Jarchow v. EderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Pioneer Gas Utilities Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. R. v. Smith Supply Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API