Legal Opinion

Blasdel v. Gower

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1918No. 7896PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, hereinafter styled plaintiff, against John F. Blasdel, Robert Chalfant, H. H. Thomas, and J. M. Ray, to recover $400 actual damages and $1,000 exemplary damages for fraud and deceit of the defendants in acquiring from the plaintiff a team of horses. There was judgment for plaintiff against all of said defendants, but only John E. Blasdel and Robert Chalfant appeal to this court, and will hereinafter be styled defendants, but all of said defendants are made parties to said appeal. The petition in this case is .as follows:

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Smith v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Hodgins v. NoyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Barsh v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. McCoy v. WosikaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API