Legal Opinion

Carignano v. Box

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. 14668PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Latimer county, Okla., by Nick Box, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against C. Carignano, plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover $1,100 upon a loan from defendant in error to plaintiff in error.

The parties 'to this action will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the court below.’

Plaintiff alleges that on the 7th day of June, 1918, for a valuable consideration, the defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff’ a,i paper writing, whereby dfefendan/t agreed to pay the plaintiff the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Drum Standish Commission Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API