Legal Opinion

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Latty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 1920No. 9504PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee •County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by Martha Latty against the Muskogee Electric Traction Company. Érom judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This was ah action for personal injury commenced in the district court •of' Muskogee county, by the defendant in •error against the plaintiff in error. The parties will be referred to herein as they ap-. peared in the court below.

The. plaintiff sued to recover $5,000. The .•cause was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $.1.000, upon which the trial court rendered judgment, to reverse which this proceeding in ■error was regularly commenced.

The defendant’s assignments of error are: (1) The court erred in overruling motion 'for a new trial; (2) verdict and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  2. Richmond City Railway Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Cartwright v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. McGovern v. Inter Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. G. A. Nichols Co. v. LockhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McClearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Lieberman v. Merring, Martin & Boise Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Steinburg v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API