Legal Opinion
Velikonja v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 6, 2005No. CIV.A.04-1001(ESH)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former eniployee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), has brought suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., claiming retaliation and constructive discharge. In light of an earlier Title VII suit filed by plaintiff against this defendant, defendant has moved to dismiss this action based on the doctrine of res judicata. 1 For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that defendant’s motion should be denied in part and granted in part, but it will require plaintiff…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brenda Curtis and Alvin Williamson v. Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc. And Citicorp SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coghlan v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Alford v. Providence HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ESTATE OF GAITHER EX REL. GAITHER v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Toms v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Brown v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.