Legal Opinion
Coghlan v. Peters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 28, 2008No. Civil Action 05-1476(PLF)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respectively, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. 2 On March 31, 2008, 2008 WL 906845, this Court issued an Order and Judgment granting defendant’s motion, and noting that an Opinion explaining the Court’s reasoning would follow. The Court now sets forth its reasoning.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Nguyen v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Adesalu v. CoppsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Rand v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Moncada v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.