Legal Opinion
Toms v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 3, 2009No. Civil Action 08-338 (RBW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Timothy Toms, brings this action under the First and Fifth Amendments and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution, the Architect of the Capitol Human Resources Act, 2 U.S.C. § 1831 (2006), and 2 U.S.C. § 60-l(a) and (b) (2006) against defendants Alan Hantman, Richard McSeveney, Arthur Mclntye, Edgar Martinez, Gerald Walker and Rebecca Tiscione, named in their personal capacities, and against the Architect of the Capitol, Stephen Ayers, in his official capacity. Currently before the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jacobson v. HofgardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Holt v. Walsh Grp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Haralson v. Management & Training Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- American Federation of Labor v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.