Legal Opinion
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 2003No. C6-02-2117PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Relator David Pietsch challenges the Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examin*919ers’ conclusions that he engaged in unlawful fee splitting in violation of Minn.Stat. § 148.10, subd. 1(a)(16) (2002), and unprofessional conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 148.10, subd. 1(a)(11), (e) (2002). Relator moves to strike portions of respondent’s brief and asserts that the board’s conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that the board’s determination that relator engaged in unprofessional conduct is supported by substantial evidence, but that the board’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Fabio v. BellomoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Petition of Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finucan v. Maryland Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003