Legal Opinion
Finucan v. Maryland Board of Physician Quality Assurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 5, 2004No. 71, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
On 21 October 1998, Respondent, the Board of Physician Quality Assurance 1 (“the Board”), received a written complaint from a female patient of Thomas E. Finucan, Jr., M.D., Petitioner, alleging that Finucan engaged in a sexual relationship with her while concurrently acting as her physician. The subsequent investigation by the Board disclosed that, between 1993 and 1998, Finucan engaged in a series of sexual relationships with several female patients while maintaining, at the same time, a physician-patient relationship with them.
The Board charged Finucan with “immoral or…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Robert Perez v. Michael J. Hoblock, Jr. Cheryl Buley Joseph P. Neglia Edward J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Halici v. City of GaithersburgCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.