Legal Opinion
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 2003No. C6-02-2117Published
1Opinion of the Court
662 N.W.2d 917 (2003)
David M. PIETSCH, D.C., et al., Relators,
v.
MINNESOTA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Respondent.
No. C6-02-2117.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 17, 2003.
John B. Wolfe, Jr., Wolfe & Associates, St. Paul, and Wilbur W. Fluegel, Fluegel Law Office, Minneapolis, for relators David M. Pietsch, D.C. and Pietsch Chiropractic Clinic.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Rosellen Condon, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondent.
Considered and decided by HALBROOKS, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and FORSBERG, Judge.[*]
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Relator David Pietsch challenges…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.