Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
David Pietsch, D.C., seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals affirming the Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ (the Board) disciplinary action against him based on the Board’s conclusion that he engaged in unprofessional conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 148.10, subd. l(a)(ll) and (e) (2002). We reverse and remand.
Pietsch, a Doctor of Chiropractic, owns and operates the Pietsch Chiropractic Clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota. Pietsch was first licensed to practice chiropractic in Minnesota in February 1998. At all times relevant to the Board’s disciplinary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re Senty-HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Strickland v. Iowa Board of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
- In Re Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of GILLETTE CHILDREN’S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, St. Luke’s Hospital, North Memorial Health Care, HealthEast Care System, Park Nicollet Health Services, Fairview Health Services, and Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Minnesota Voters Alliance, Relators v. Anoka-Hennepin School District, Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.