Fabio v. Bellomo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
In challenging summary judgment for respondent, appellant argues that her negligence action should not be barred because she maintained a continuous course of treatment with respondent until 1986, and that respondent’s conduct was a substantial factor in the advancement of appellant’s breast cancer. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Delores Fabio was a patient of respondent James Bellomo, M.D., from 1977 until June 27,1986. Appellant noticed a lump in her left breast and consulted respondent about it sometime between 1982 and 1984. During that examination, respondent detected a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.