Temple v. . Laberge
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by intervener and garnishees from Granmer, J., at April Term, 1922, of New HaNoveR. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe plaintiff prosecutes this action to recover damages for breach of contract. He alleges that he and the defendant entered into a contract by the terms of which the defendant was to sell at sundry dates certain cars of hay at an agreed price; that the defendant knew that the purchase was made with a view to a resale of the hay at a profit; that the defendant shipped only a part of the hay ordered by the plaintiff, and thereby failed to comply with the terms of his contract, in consequence of which the plaintiff suffered loss. The defendant, who was a resident of the Dominion of Canada,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Armour Packing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Cotton Mills v. Weil.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Third National Bank of St. Louis v. ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- First National Bank of Springfield v. Asheville Furniture & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michigan Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Denton v. Shenandoah Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Sitterson v. . SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Sugg v. St. Mary's Oil Engine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.