Legal Opinion

Third National Bank of St. Louis v. Exum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Justice, J., at June Term, 1913, of LENOIR.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

This is another of the numerous actions upon notes executed to McLaughlin Brothers for the purchase of an “imported French coach horse,” of which so many have appeared in our reports. At this term, in a ease of this kind, Trust Co. v. Ellen, ante, 45, we quoted Winter v. Nobs, 19, Idaho, at page 28, where that Court took notice from the reported cases that suits of this nature, in behalf of McLaughlin Brothers, were numerous throughout the country.

In this case, the defendant tendered an issue, “Is plaintiff the bona fide owner of the note in due course?” The assignment of error on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Park v. . ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Abrams v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Armour Packing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Davis v. Butters Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API