Legal Opinion

T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeicsON, J.

The facts essential are set forth in the opinion.

This case was before this Court at Fall Term, 1922. (See 184 N. C., 150.)

The court below, in that case, nonsuited the plaintiff, and a new trial was granted by this Court. Adams, J., for the Court, clearly and concisely states the law applicable, and then the facts on which a new trial was granted, as follows: "Inspection of the record and examination of the briefs filed by counsel lead to the conclusion that the controversy as to the alleged acceptance should have been submitted to the jury. There is evidence tending to show that on 6 February…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Patton v. Sinclaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Best v. British & American Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Mason v. Town of AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Albemarle Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API