Legal Opinion

Michigan Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n v. Neal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action, instituted 13 June, 1927, to recover $401.35, balance alleged to be due for medical attention and services rendered defendant's son while a patient in plaintiff's sanitarium from 16 April, 1925, to 8 June of the same year.

On 4 July, 1927, the defendant filed answer and alleged that, in sending her 27-year-old son, W. W. Neal, to plaintiff's sanitarium, she was acting "not only in her own behalf, but also for and in behalf of her said son"; that by reason of plaintiff's careless and negligent treatment her son, instead of being benefited, sustained, as a direct and proximate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Bowman v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. First National Bank of Springfield v. Asheville Furniture & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Aiken v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API