Legal Opinion

Cotton Mills v. Weil.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1901PublishedCited by 21 opinions

AotxoN by Alpine Cotton Mills against Weil Brothers and tbe Bank of Opelika, intervenor, beard by Judge E. W. Tim-berlahe and a jury, at May Term, 1901, of tbe Superior Court of Bubeb County. Erom tbe judgment, tbe plaintiff and intervenor bank appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCooK, J.

Weil Brothers shipped to plaintiff fifty bales of cotton, and drew a sight draft upon plaintiff for tbe value of the cotton, with bill of lading attached, in favor of appellant, Bant of Opelika.

Weil Brothers and the Bank of Opelika were non-residents of this State, being residents of the State of Alabama, and plaintiff resided at Morganton, in this State. Upon arrival of the cotton in Morganton, and while it was in the possession of the Southern Railway Company, plaintiff instituted an action against Weil Brothers, wherein it claimed that they were liable to it in the sum of $500 on account…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Wallace Bros. v. RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. First National Bank of Springfield v. Asheville Furniture & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. L. H. Blair & Co. v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Walsh, Boyle & Co. v. First National Bank of HiawathaIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Davis v. Butters Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API