Legal Opinion

Sugg v. St. Mary's Oil Engine Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

There was no prejudicial error in the refusal of the court to submit the issue tendered by plaintiffs, although it was the issue raised by the pleadings. The garnishee paid the amount of his indebtedness on the note into court, after the pleadings had been filed; the matter in controversy, therefore, at the trial was the ownership of the funds then in the hands of the court. The issue as submitted by the court was sufficient in form to enable the parties to present to the jury their contentions as to every phase of the matter to be determined by them. The assignment of error, with respect to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Freeman v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Ivey v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Cotton Mills v. Weil.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. McKinney v. . SutphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Arnold v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Arnold v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API