Legal Opinion

Sitterson v. . Speller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaot, C. J.

This is an' action in claim and delivery, instituted by plaintiff, as mortgagee and lienee, to recover of the defendant, Thomas Speller, the possession of certain crops and articles of personal property, described in various mortgages and liens executed by defendant to plaintiff. Judgment by default was entered against the defendant because of his failure to appear or file any answer to plaintiff’s complaint. But after the institution of the action and before trial, "W. P. Speller was allowed to intervene and set up claim to all the property seized by the sheriff, except two mules which he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Springfield v. Asheville Furniture & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Temple v. . LabergeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Sterling Mills, Inc. v. Saginaw Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Mangum v. Mutual Grain Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Dawson v. Thigpen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michigan Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. McKinney v. . SutphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Mohn v. . CresseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Sugg v. St. Mary's Oil Engine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API