Legal Opinion

Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1923No. S. F. No. 10720PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The parties- are here on an order to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be granted restraining the respondents from selling an automobile alleged to have been illegally used in transporting intoxicating liquor. The petitioner, Traffic Truck Sales Co. of California, on or about the first day of March, 1923, delivered to Joseph Mussio an automobile truck under the terms of a conditional sales agreement, wherein and whereby title to the truck was reserved in the vendor until it should be fully paid for. The sales company assigned the contract to It. A. Crandall Company, the other…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  4. United States v. 1960 Bags of CoffeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  5. Henderson's Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API