Legal Opinion

People v. One 1941 Mercury Sedan, Engine No. 302286

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1946No. Civ. 12934PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This proceeding was instituted by the state pursuant to section 11610 et seq, of the Health and Safety Code to declare a forfeiture of the interests of one Frank Williams, the registered owner, and of the Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco, the legal owner, in a designated automobile, on the ground that such automobile was on April 18, 1944, used unlawfully to conceal, convey, carry or transport marihuana in violation of law. The bank has been paid the balance due on the purchase price of the automobile and has no further legal interest in the proceeding. The trial court excluded…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. HeightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. State v. CramOregon Supreme Court · 1945

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API