Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Bennett
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an action by a street contractor to foreclose the lien of a street assessment on account of street improvements in the city of San Jose. Defendant Bennett was sued as the owner of the property, the other defendants being alleged to have or claim some interest or lien which, if it exists, is subject to plaintiff’s alleged lien. Defendants had judgment and plaintiff appeals therefrom on the judgment-roll alone. By a decision heretofore rendered by this court the judgment was affirmed, but that decision was vacated and a rehearing granted for the purpose of giving further consideration…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- City of Rochester v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bell v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. One 1933 Plymouth Sedan Deluxe Automobile, Engine No. P. D. 165124California Supreme Court · 1939
- Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Raisch v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.