Quemos Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, under and by virtue of Rule 34 (Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, 28 U.S.C. A. following section 723c), seeks an order directing the defendants to produce for inspection and allow it to inspect and copy certain documents, records and correspondence, more particularly identified in what has been referred to as Parts I, II, and III of the Notice filed on May 29, 1940.
Rule 34 is limited to parties (C. F. Simonin’s Sons, Inc., v. American Can Co., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 420), and provides the only method of obtaining discovery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Bartow v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
- Gielow v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Standard Ultramarine & Color Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Hart v. WolffAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Weinberg v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.