Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Sinclair Refining Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 9, 1942No. Civil 2507PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

These are motions made on behalf of the defendant:

1. For an order directing judgment ■dismissing the complaint herein on the grounds (a) that the complaint fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted, and (b) that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to establish that this Court has jurisdiction ■of the subject matter of this action.

2. In the alternative, in the event that the foregoing motion numbered “1” should be denied, for an order striking out as immaterial, irrelevant, redundant and impertinent or as mere conclusions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Alabama Independent Service Station Ass'n v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1939
  4. American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  3. Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
  4. Kilduff v. Cosential, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  5. Revere Camera Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API