Legal Opinion
Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 26, 1950No. 12434-YPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
Pending before the court are several actions instituted by individuals and corporations against the same defendants, whidh seek equitable relief and treble damages under the federal anti-trust laws and double damages under the California state anti-trust act. In each of these cases, there is one cause of action for treble damages under Section 3 of the Act of the Congress of June 19, 1936, 1 — commonly referred to as the “Robinson-Patman Act”. The section reads: “It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.