Legal Opinion
Hart v. Wolff
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1971No. 1324, 1331PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Justice.
Plaintiff Victor Hart has appealed from the dismissal of his complaint for failure to comply with an order to produce certain documents for defendant’s inspection. Defendant Rodney Wolff has cross-appealed from the superior court’s award to him of a nominal attorney’s fee.
On December 12, 1963, Hart filed suit against Wolff alleging that on two occasions Wolff had made statements defaming Hart. The statements concerned an alleged misappropriation of funds by Hart in the formation of Arctic Bowl, Inc., an Alaska corporation which Hart and Wolff, along with others, had organized…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Parker v. MatthewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.