Legal Opinion
Bartow v. Erie Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 13, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On error to the Supremo Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*13The opinion of the court was delivered by '
Fort, J.
There axe a number of grounds for reversal assigned in this case, but a careful examination of them leads us to conclude that there is but a single one that has substance.
It is clear, under the proof, that the plaintiff could not have been nonsuited, nor a verdict directed fox the defendant, upon the testimony.
There were no reversible errors in the rulings of the court upon the admissions of testimony excepted to, nor in the charge of , the court, except in one respect, with relation to the allowance of damages for loss of profits in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- East Jersey Water Co. v. BigelowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bokoshe Smokeless Coal Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Quemos Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Henry Clay v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Davis v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.