Legal Opinion

Gielow v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 7, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion on the part of the defendants to compel the complainant to produce for their inspection the original documents or papers upon which the complainant’s alleged story, “Give me this Night, or Flirtation Walk”, and complainant’s alleged musical compositions entitled “I can’t Believe” and “Mr. and Mrs. is the Name” were written; also for a sworn statement to the effect that the documents produced are the original documents or papers upon which said original papers were written.

This motion comes squarely within the provisions of Rule 34 of the Federal Rules…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
Quemos Theatre Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.