Legal Opinion
National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 6, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1735 (BAH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
In this case, a union representing federal employees challenges the constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment of a U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) policy expanding random drug testing to incumbent employees who work with at-risk youth in residential Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers (“JCCCC”). These centers are located in remote or rural areas within the National Forest System, and are operated by the U.S. Forest Service (“USFS”), an agency of the USDA. The plaintiff National Federation of Federal Employees, Federal District…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Lauren Palmer v. Rebecca CaccioppoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Lauren Palmer v. Rebecca CaccioppoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012