Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lauren Palmer v. Rebecca Caccioppo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 2011No. 09-3924Unpublished

1DissentClay, Circuit Judge

Neither the record in this case nor the applicable law support the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendants on Plaintiffs claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l). We should therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings. Because the majority erroneously affirms the judgment of the district court as explained below, I respectfully dissent.1

I. Section 1983 Claim

In her claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Hooper violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API