Legal Opinion
National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 8, 2012No. 11-5135PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The National Federation of Federal Employees (“the Union”) challenges the constitutionality of a random drug testing policy applicable to all employees working at Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers operated by the U.S. Forest Service. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Chief of the U.S. Forest Service (hereinafter “the Secretary”) and denied the Union’s request for a preliminary injunction. Upon de novo review, we…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael Barrett, IV v. Donald ClaycombCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 79 v. Rick ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
- Lewis v. Gov't of the D.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.