Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 8, 2012No. 11-5135Published

1DissentKavanaugh, Circuit Judge

This case concerns drug testing of government employees who work at specialized residential schools for at-risk youth. In my view, Supreme Court precedent and common sense strongly support this narrowly targeted drug testing program. I would affirm Judge Howell’s decision for the District Court upholding the program. I therefore respectfully dissent.

I

Ratified in 1791, the Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable” government searches and seizures. By establishing reasonableness as the legal test, the text of the Fourth Amendment requires judges to engage in a common-law-like balancing of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API