National Federation of Federal Employees-IAM v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentKavanaugh, Circuit Judge
This case concerns drug testing of government employees who work at specialized residential schools for at-risk youth. In my view, Supreme Court precedent and common sense strongly support this narrowly targeted drug testing program. I would affirm Judge Howell’s decision for the District Court upholding the program. I therefore respectfully dissent.
I
Ratified in 1791, the Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable” government searches and seizures. By establishing reasonableness as the legal test, the text of the Fourth Amendment requires judges to engage in a common-law-like balancing of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.