Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Harris-Smith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 21, 1999No. Misc. AG, No. 8, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This professional discipline matter involves, among other charges, the unauthorized practice of law. The respondent maintained a principal office for the practice of law for approximately three years in Landover, Maryland without ever having been admitted in Maryland. The defense rests on the respondent’s admission to practice during that time before the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the Maryland District) and on our decision in Kennedy v. Bar Association of Montgomery County, 316 Md. 646, 561 A.2d 200 (1989).
The respondent is Bridgette…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HallmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSIOIN v. SeidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarneysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.