Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hallmon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 28, 1996No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 13, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The respondent, Morgan Joseph Hallmon (Hallmon), has been found to have assisted an unlicensed person in the unauthorized practice of law in violation of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.5(b). 1 That violation involved a hearing before a Zoning Hearing Officer for Prince George’s County. Investigation of that complaint led to further charges and findings of violations, namely, failure to respond to a demand for information by Bar Counsel in violation of Rule 8.1(b), 2 and failing to maintain an escrow account in violation of various requirements,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grievance Comm., Bar of New Haven County v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. In Re DiscipioIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Lukas v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Ferris v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API