Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 2004No. 690 Disciplinary Docket 2PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

In this matter, we consider Petitioner Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s (the “ODC”) Petition for Adjudication of Contempt filed against Respondent Frank J. Marcone alleging that Mr. Marcone has acted in violation of our July 1995 order suspending him from, inter alia, the practice of law. In determining whether the ODC’s Petition should be granted, we are necessarily required to analyze the issue of whether an attorney who has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania may nevertheless maintain a law office in the Commonwealth of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Stone Crushed Partnership v. Kassab Archbold Jackson & O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Surrick v. KillionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API