Legal Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSIOIN v. Seiden
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 14, 2003No. Misc. Docket No. 19, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
On April 16, 2002, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, petitioner, by Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Gail D. Kessler, Assistant Bar Counsel, filed a petition 1 for disciplinary action against Richard Seiden, respondent, for multiple violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). The petition alleged that respondent, based upon his representation of Penelope L. Mentlik, had violated MRPC 1.1,1.15(b) and 8.4(a) and (d). 2
On April 17, 2002, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709 et seq., this Court transmitted the matter to Judge Thomas J. Bolling er, Sr.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.