Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Bar Counsel filed two Petitions for Disciplinary Action on behalf of petitioner, Attorney Grievance Commission, against Enroll Donnelly Brown, respondent, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709. Both petitions were consolidated for review before the Court of Appeals. The first petition (Misc. Docket AG No. 2) alleges numerous violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct based on three separate complaints filed against respondent. The second petition (Mise. Docket AG No. 34) seeks a “reciprocal” sanction for respondent’s suspension for thirty days from the practice of law…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.