Smith v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT & LIBERTY MUT. INS.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the Commission erred in finding as a fact and concluding as law that an employer-employee relationship existed. Appellate review of an award of the Industrial Commission is limited to reviewing (1) whether there was competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings; and (2) whether such findings support its legal conclusions. Perry v. Furniture Company, 296 N.C. 88, 249 S.E. 2d 397 (1978); McRae v. Wall, 260 N.C. 576, 133 S.E. 2d 220 (1963).
The record contains ample evidence of the employer-employee relationship. By way of example,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Anderson v. Century Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Reco Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Jacobs v. Central Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Munoz v. Caldwell Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.