Legal Opinion

Smith v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT & LIBERTY MUT. INS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 8010IC584PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the Commission erred in finding as a fact and concluding as law that an employer-employee relationship existed. Appellate review of an award of the Industrial Commission is limited to reviewing (1) whether there was competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings; and (2) whether such findings support its legal conclusions. Perry v. Furniture Company, 296 N.C. 88, 249 S.E. 2d 397 (1978); McRae v. Wall, 260 N.C. 576, 133 S.E. 2d 220 (1963).

The record contains ample evidence of the employer-employee relationship. By way of example,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Anderson v. Century Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Reco Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Jacobs v. Central Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
  5. Munoz v. Caldwell Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API